Hindsight check: LL2-17 (Ch 17 Ecosystems and managing the dynamics of change)#

Source section: EEA, Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation (EEA Report No 1/2013), Ch 17, by Jacqueline McGlade and Sybille van den Hove. Panel 17.1 (“The last hunters”) is by McGlade alone. Panel 17.2 (EU fisheries) is by Constança Belchior and Johnny Reker. Report pp. 407–428. Check window: publication (2013) to late September 2026. Checked: 26 September 2026.

Method note. - No general web search. The session’s search budget was exhausted, so I fetched primary repositories directly: - Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO): the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) publications database, read in a rendering browser because the site needs JavaScript, and DFO news releases; - Justice Laws (the Fisheries Act); - Norway’s Institute of Marine Research (IMR), which now publishes the bilateral Norwegian–Russian assessments; - the ICES library, through its figshare API; - STECF (the EU Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries) and DG MARE (the Commission’s fisheries department); - the IPCC, PIK (the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), the Global Tipping Points Report and IPBES. - Journal articles. Metadata and abstracts come from Crossref, Europe PMC, Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex. Where a point rests on an abstract only, I say so. - Blocked sites. regjeringen.no (the Norwegian government) and EUR-Lex both served bot-verification pages. I did not try to get around them. As a result I have no primary text for the 2026 Norwegian–Russian cod quota decision or for the EU’s 2019 emergency regulation on eastern Baltic cod. - Annex 3 does not apply. Annex 3 updates only the 2001 cases, and this chapter is new in 2013. - I read only the section digest, the section’s source extract and web sources. Page numbers are report pages of the 2013 volume. - Interests and positions. - McGlade was a DFO scientist before leading the EEA, and Panel 17.1 is her first-person account. - George Rose, the most prominent later critic of the reopening of the northern cod fishery [S11], is also a former DFO scientist and a long-standing independent voice on northern cod. - Froese and co-authors [S25, S26] are long-standing critics of EU catch-setting. - Since 2022 the Barents Sea cod assessments have been produced by a bilateral Norwegian–Russian group outside ICES and are not ICES-reviewed [S19].

Overview#

1. The Canadian story holds, and in places is strengthened. The chapter’s “irreversible” framing does not. - What hindsight supports. Nothing published since 2013 disputes the account of warnings overridden in 1986–92. - DFO’s current assessment model now does several things the chapter said the 1980s model failed to do: - it estimates natural mortality year by year, and finds it ranging from 0.22 to 0.88 since 1995; - it incorporates inshore juvenile surveys; - it includes an index of capelin, the cod’s main prey [S1, S4]. - A 2021 reconstruction of cod catches since 1508 concludes that stabilising fishing in the 1980s could have sustained about 200,000 t a year [S13]. - What hindsight overturns. The stock came back. - The commercial moratorium ended in June 2024 [S5]. - In 2026 DFO assessed the stock in the “Healthy Zone”, 2.3 times its limit reference point (LRP), for the first time since 1992 [S1, S7]. - The total allowable catch (TAC) rose from 18,000 t (2024) to 38,000 t (2025) to 59,000 t (2026) [S5–S7]. - Two caveats. - Part of the improvement in status reflects a change of yardstick. The 2023 model revision lowered the LRP by about 40% while leaving stock estimates since 1983 “largely the same” [S3]. An independent critic describes the cumulative reduction as from 1.3 to 0.25 million t [S11]. - The stock remains “well below historical norms” [S11]. Capelin, the wider fish community and the outport fishery have not returned to pre-collapse levels [S1, S16].

2. The Norway exemplar needs correcting and has aged badly. - Factual problems in the chapter’s account. - There was no moratorium in 1990. The agreed TAC was 160,000 t and catches were about 212,000 t [S17]. - Fishing on spawning cod was not banned. Current advice still notes that “a large proportion of the fishery on spawning cod takes place before spawning time” [S17]. - The capelin fishery was already closed. It had been shut since the late 1980s, before the 1989 survey [S18]. - The minister was probably misidentified. The minister the chapter quotes appears to have taken office only in November 1990 [S22; secondary source]. - What the chapter got right. The rebound it describes is real. In today’s assessment the 1992 spawning stock was the highest since 1947 [S17]. - What happened after 2013. - The Barents Sea stock peaked at a record in 2013. By 2025 it had fallen to the lowest level since 2000, below its precautionary reference point [S17, S20, S21]. - The Norway–Russia commission set TACs above scientific advice in several years since 2013 [S17]. The agreed catch rule caps year-to-year TAC changes at 20%, and that cap kept fishing “well above the target” for years [S17]. - Russia’s departure from ICES has split the assessment system [S19]. - The consequence for the chapter’s contrast. The clean Canada-versus-Norway comparison is now much harder to sustain.

3. EU fisheries have improved in the North-East Atlantic, but the Panel 17.2 prediction largely holds. - Improvement. - The share of North-East Atlantic stocks fished above maximum-sustainable-yield (MSY) rates fell from about 65% (2003) to 29% (2023) [S23]. - The Council set 81% of 2026 EU-only Atlantic catch limits in line with MSY advice [S28]. - But the 2020 MSY deadline was missed. - In 2024 only 24 of 84 North-East Atlantic stocks were both fished below MSY rates and within safe biological limits [S23]. - The share of overfished stocks and the share outside safe limits have both risen since 2021 [S23]. - The Mediterranean remains worse than the North-East Atlantic [S23]. - The Council still departs from advice [S28, S29]. - Baltic cod collapsed. The directed eastern Baltic fishery closed in 2019 [S30]. ICES now advises zero catch of eastern Baltic cod through 2028 and “is not able to identify any level of catch that allows the recovery of the stock” [S30].

4. The planetary-boundary and tipping-element claims are partly vindicated and partly contested. - Transgression. The planetary-boundaries team now reports seven of nine boundaries transgressed [S35, S37]. But “transgression” is a precautionary judgement, not an observation that a threshold has been crossed, and critics dispute that global thresholds exist for some processes [S38–S40]. The chapter’s “tantalising ignorance” about thresholds per se is therefore largely intact. - The chapter’s list of tipping elements under way. - Weakened: Arctic summer sea ice has been dropped as a tipping element. The IPCC finds “no tipping point” and losses “potentially reversible” (high confidence) [S41, S42, S44]. - Contested: evidence on Atlantic overturning is split [S43, S46–S49]. - Strengthened: ice-sheet destabilisation. Separately, coral reefs, which the chapter did not list, are now judged to be crossing a thermal tipping point [S45].

5. The early-warning claim is partly supported. Calling generic threshold models “an exercise in futility” was too strong; generic indicators remain widely used. Recent work nonetheless finds three things: - tipping times cannot be reliably predicted from historical statistics [S49]; - physics-based, locally observable warning signals outperform generic statistical ones in at least one major case [S47]; - recruitment relationships in fish stocks are non-stationary and stock-specific [S50].

6. The IPBES comment was accurate in 2013 but is now dated. IPBES adopted an operational approach to indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in 2017 and has since built: - a participatory mechanism; - methodological guidance; - ILK dialogues attached to each assessment [S51, S52].

Scholars still argue that scientific knowledge remains the authoritative voice [S53, S54].

What hindsight does to the chapter’s mechanisms (technology-neutral)#

Claim-by-claim#

Claim 1: Canada’s northern cod assessments systematically overstated the stock (one unit; recruitment and natural mortality held constant; discards; offshore “tuning”; inshore data excluded). DFO had evidence by 1986, ministers raised the TAC for 1988 and rejected December 1988 advice to halve it, and the fishery closed only in 1992 (pp. 411–414; Auditor General 1997 quoted on p. 414)#

Subsequent developments

No post-2013 source disputes the historical account. The claim rests on the Harris review (1990), Michael Harris’s 1998 book and the Auditor General (1997), all published before the check window. I found no later source that contests the sequence of warnings and override.

A long-run reconstruction supports the counterfactual. - Schijns, Froese, Hutchings and Pauly (2021) modelled the stock’s trajectory from 1508 to 2019. They call the case “the most spectacular case of an exploited stock crashed in a few decades by an industrial bottom trawl fishery under a seemingly sophisticated management regime” [S13, abstract]. - They conclude that if fishing effort had been stabilised in the 1980s, “precautionary annual yields of about 200000 tonnes could have been sustained” [S13]. - They also suggest recovery “may have been hindered by premature openings” [S13]. - The historical data were challenged in a published comment and defended in a reply (ICES J Mar Sci 2022; see note under S13). I read the titles only.

DFO’s own model now does much of what the chapter said was missing. The 2023 framework review (published 2024) made four changes [S4]: - it extended the assessment model back to 1954; - it incorporated “juvenile survey data from inshore monitoring programs”, which allowed a stock–recruitment relationship; - it added a capelin index, because “Capelin affect the dynamics of this cod stock”; - it investigated harp seals but could not include them.

The 2026 assessment estimates natural mortality (ages 5+) at between 0.22 and 0.88 since 1995, with a mean of 0.47 [S1]. That is the opposite of a constant. The chapter’s criticism of holding natural mortality and recruitment constant (p. 414) is therefore borne out by the department’s own later practice.

Stock structure: the “one unit” criticism gets mixed support. - Rose and Rowe (2022) argue that the production area and the assessment area are spatially mismatched [S12]. The northern boundary was moved south in the early 1970s, and SSB–recruitment relationships that include 1960s data “do not represent potential production from a more southerly distributed stock”. Rebuilding to historical abundance would need a “portfolio” of spawning from northern Labrador to the Grand Bank [S12, abstract]. - A genome scan found that neutral markers indicate a single interbreeding population north of about 45°N [S14, abstract]. Outlier markers suggest “different ecological niches” [S14]. - So the issue is less “one unit versus many” than a loss of spatial and ecological components within one population.

Delay persisted after the collapse too. Rose and Rowe’s 2018 Nature correspondence was titled “Canadian cod comeback derailed” [S11 context; title only]. It reflects the 2017–18 setback, after which DFO cut the stewardship quota to 9,500 t. I have that figure only from a secondary source (Wikipedia citing CBC) and did not verify it.

Verdict: held up. The mechanisms the chapter identified have, if anything, been confirmed by DFO’s later changes to its own model. The stock-structure point is more complicated than the chapter suggests.

Implication for weight. Transferable insights 1–2 and 4–7 in the digest (masked decline, loyalty to the model, independent re-analysis, burden of proof, demands for “more evidence”) can carry substantial weight. The strongest evidence is that the responsible agency, 30 years on, built into its model the very variables the chapter said had been wrongly fixed.

Claim 2: After the autumn 1989 survey found Barents Sea cod at a 100-year low, Norway cut quotas, imposed a “moratorium” in January 1990, closed the capelin fishery, spent over EUR 50 million on fleet capacity (incomes fell up to 40%) and reportedly banned fishing on spawning grounds; by 1992 spawning biomass was the highest in 25 years (pp. 411, 414). Check “moratorium”, the spawning-ground ban, and post-2013 status.#

Subsequent developments

“Moratorium” is not supported by the catch record. The Norwegian–Russian working group’s advice for 2026 includes the full history of advice, TACs and catches [S17]:

• Quotas were cut steeply and set at or below advice in 1989–1990 [S17], but fishing continued.
• A temporary stop for particular fleet groups in 1990 is possible. I could not verify one because regjeringen.no was blocked.
• Either way, “moratorium” misdescribes the policy.

The spawning-ground ban is contradicted by current practice. - The 2025 advice warns that “a large proportion of the fishery on spawning cod takes place before spawning time around 1 April”. It adds that a TAC above advice “could directly result in recruitment impairment” [S17]. - The traditional winter fishery on spawning aggregations therefore continues. - Area-specific closures may exist, but a general ban on fishing spawning cod, as the chapter implies (p. 411), does not. - The chapter’s source for Norway is chiefly a journalist’s book (Harris 1998), per the digest.

The capelin closure is confirmed but predates the survey. The capelin history shows zero TAC and zero catch in 1988, 1989 and 1990, with the fishery reopening in 1991 [S18]. The closure was therefore already in place before the autumn 1989 survey.

The rebound is confirmed. - In the current assessment the spawning stock biomass (SSB) went 115 kt (1987) → 191 kt (1988) → 237 kt (1989) → 303 kt (1990) → 636 kt (1991) → 803 kt (1992). The 1992 figure is the highest since 1947 [S17]. “Largest in 25 years” is therefore an understatement. - Fishing mortality fell from 0.93 (1987) to 0.42 (1990) [S17]. - A strong year class was maturing at the same time: the 1983 year class numbered 1.37 billion at age 3 in 1986 [S17]. This is my reading of the table. The chapter attributes the recovery to “prompt action” alone (p. 414). The data are consistent with both lower fishing and good recruitment.

Other details. - In the current series the late-1980s SSB low was in 1987 (115 kt), and SSB was already rising by 1989 [S17]. The “100-year low” in the chapter refers to the survey; I could not check that. - A Wikipedia list of ministers, citing the Norwegian government, gives Oddrunn Pettersen’s term as 3 November 1990 to 4 September 1992 [S22, secondary]. The chapter presents her as the minister who responded to the collapse with “the moratorium” (p. 411). The January 1990 measures fell in her predecessor Svein Munkejord’s term (October 1989 to November 1990), per the same list. - I could not verify the EUR 50 million or the 40% income fall.

After 2013: from record high to below the precautionary level. - SSB peaked at about 2.19 million t in 2013, the highest in the series back to 1946 [S17]. The 2025 estimate is about 330 kt, “about halfway between Bpa and Blim and the lowest since 2000” [S17]. Bpa is the precautionary reference level and Blim the limit level. - The main cause is recruitment failure that began after about 2006. Johannesen et al. (2026) review the likely causes [S21, abstract]: - a northward shift in spawning; - reduced inflow of Calanus, the copepod that feeds larval cod; - density-dependent effects at record stock size; - “large uncertainties” about all of these. - The ICES integrated assessment adds that “fishing mortality has been too high in recent years” [S20].

Management since 2013 departed from the chapter’s picture of Norway. - Agreed TACs exceeded advice in 2013 (1,000,000 t against 940,000 t), 2016–2020 and 2025 (340,000 t against 311,587 t) [S17]. - The 2016 catch rule caps year-to-year TAC changes at ±20%. The working group states that this cap “has led to fishing pressure well above the target in the HCR for several years” [S17]. (HCR is the harvest control rule.) - The capelin TAC for 2015 was set at 120,000 t against advice of 6,000 t [S18]. - Advice for both 2025 and 2026 was zero capelin catch [S18].

The assessment system itself has fractured. - Russia was suspended from ICES in 2022 and left at the end of 2025. ICES no longer assesses Barents Sea cod. - The bilateral assessments “are neither reviewed nor endorsed by ICES” [S19]. - As of July 2026 the most recent published cod advice was the 2025 advice [S19].

Verdict: partly held up. - Correct: the rapid, politically backed quota cuts, the capelin closure and the recovery by 1992. - Not supported: “moratorium” and the spawning-ground ban. The named minister is doubtful. - Complicated by later events: the post-2013 record of TACs above advice and decline below Bpa.

Implication for weight. Transferable insight 10 in the digest (prompt, politically backed cuts plus research and capacity reduction enabled recovery) should stay at “suggestive” at most. - The episode shows that decisive cuts can coincide with recovery, but recruitment was also favourable. - The same institution later showed the override pattern the chapter attributes to Canada and the EU. - The chapter’s maxim “no evidence of harm is not the same as evidence of no harm” (p. 411) survives as logic. It should not rest on the claimed Norwegian spawning-ground ban. - A mechanism the chapter did not name emerges clearly: rules that cap the rate of change in quotas can delay the response to decline.

Claim 3: The northern cod collapse was an “unanticipated, sudden collapse and irreversible demise” (p. 409). Check against status after 2013 and the ending of the moratorium.#

Subsequent developments

The stock recovered enough to reopen the fishery. The key steps, from DFO’s news releases and science advisory reports:

The 2026 assessment also reports [S1]: - recruitment at about 80% of pre-collapse (1954–90) levels; - fishing mortality below 0.05 since 2004.

Landings were 32,700 t in 2025, worth about CAD 75 million [S7].

Caveat 1: much of the change in status is a change of yardstick. - The 2024 assessment explains that the model extension “informed a revision of the LRP. While estimates of stock size since 1983 were largely the same, the previous LRP was roughly 40% higher than the current LRP. Following this revision, the stock was determined to be out of the Critical Zone since 2016” [S3]. - The new LRP is 40% of B_MSY, the biomass that supports maximum sustainable yield [S4]. - Rose (2026) states that reductions in the LRP “from 1.3 to 0.25 million t” have led to larger allocations and reopened commercial and foreign fisheries “despite advice by government and independent science to keep removals low”. He adds that “surplus production and stock growth have stalled … the stall point biomass being controversial (and well below historical norms)” [S11, abstract]. That abstract predates the 2026 assessment showing SSB growth in 2025 [S1].

Caveat 2: the ecosystem has not fully recovered. DFO’s 2026 assessment states [S1]: - capelin “has yet to recover to its pre-collapse levels”; - fish-community biomass “remains below pre-collapse levels”.

The recent improvement is linked to “the ongoing warm phase that started around 2020” and better zooplankton, with long-term warming effects “unknown” [S1].

Caveat 3: the social system did not come back. Between 1998 and 2023 [S16, abstract]: - the number of fishing ports, vessels and fishers each fell by more than 70%; - shellfish, not cod, became the mainstay of the fishery.

Irreversibility is real elsewhere. - Western Baltic cod is “beyond … a tipping point”, in “a novel and likely irreversible low productivity state” [S31, abstract]. - For eastern Baltic cod, ICES “is not able to identify any level of catch that allows the recovery of the stock” [S30].

So the concept the chapter invokes is sound. It was misapplied to the northern cod stock.

Verdict: overturned, as a statement that the northern cod stock’s decline was irreversible. It was not. After more than three decades, the stock is assessed as healthy under the current framework and supports a reopened fishery. The broader point stands: the damage was long-lasting, the recovery partial relative to historical abundance, and the social losses permanent.

Implication for weight. Treat “irreversible” in the chapter as rhetorical. - The better-supported lesson is that recovery from collapse can take decades, and depends on ecosystem conditions (prey, temperature) outside managers’ control. - Recovery status is sensitive to how reference points are defined. - A new mechanism appears: when the yardstick moves, a system can change status without much change in the system itself. Pre-agreed criteria (p. 423) matter only if the criteria are themselves protected from convenient revision.

Claim 4: In EU fisheries, TACs matched advice for only 8% of assessed stocks (1987–2006) and averaged 47% above advice since 2003. 72% of assessed stocks were overexploited, about two-thirds of NE Atlantic TAC stocks lacked data for MSY advice, and only 16 of 102 Mediterranean candidate species could be assessed in 2010 (Panel 17.2, pp. 421–422)#

Subsequent developments

These are historical figures from the Commission and peer-reviewed sources of 2010–2011. I found nothing after 2013 that disputes them. The Commission itself now describes stocks as “recovering from the historic lows of 2003” [S27], which corroborates that the pre-2013 baseline was poor.

The picture has improved markedly in the North-East Atlantic, and less so in the Mediterranean. STECF’s 2026 monitoring report (data to 2024) [S23]:

• The median F/F_MSY in the North-East Atlantic is now below 1, but “some stocks still have a very high F/FMSY value” [S23].
• An independent analysis of 73 ICES assessments found median fishing mortality “just below F_MSY in 2020”. Still, “approximately half of the stocks remain fished above F_MSY” and “only 40% of stocks are currently above B_MSY” [S24, abstract].
• A 2018 analysis using different methods (and including data-limited stocks) found 69% of 397 stocks overfished and 51% outside safe biological limits [S25, abstract]. The level of the headline figure depends heavily on method.

Data gaps persist, though they have narrowed [S23]: - 53% of 159 North-East Atlantic TACs are covered, at least partially, by assessments that give an F_MSY estimate or proxy; - 16% are covered by assessments with an MSY B_trigger; - 58% of ICES-advised stocks in EU waters are data-limited; - STECF notes “for many stocks, key reference points are yet to be defined”.

Eastern Baltic cod has no defined reference points at all [S30].

Verdict: held up as a record of the situation to about 2011. The later trend in the North-East Atlantic contradicts the panel’s statement that stock condition “has continued to worsen” (p. 421). That statement was already in tension with the panel’s own figure of overfished NE Atlantic stocks falling from 94% to 63% between 2004 and 2010.

Implication for weight. The panel is sound evidence that advice was routinely overridden before 2013 (transferable insight 8 in the digest) and that data non-compliance weakened advice (insight 14). It should not be read as a description of EU fisheries today.

Claim 5: The 2012/13 CFP reform will not deliver long-term sustainability while decision-making lets short-term economic interests “outcompete” scientific advice; restoring 43 stocks to MSY would add 3.53 million t, about EUR 3.2 billion a year and over 80,000 jobs (p. 422; “EUR 3 188 billion” is a typo)#

Subsequent developments

The reform’s central legal target was missed. Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, Art. 2(2), required the MSY exploitation rate “by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks”. This is quoted in STECF [S23]. - STECF (March 2026) concludes that in 2024 only 24 of 84 North-East Atlantic stocks were both below F_MSY and inside safe biological limits, “suggesting that the objective in Art. 2.2 of the CFP has not been met” [S23]. - The proportion of overfished stocks and of stocks outside safe limits “increased … since 2021” [S23]. - 46 of 84 stocks have their biomass trigger set at the precautionary level (Bpa), “likely to be substantially lower than the biomass needed to sustain fishing at FMSY” [S23]. Winker et al. find that using this trigger as a stand-in for B_MSY “results in an over-optimistic classification of stock status” [S24].

The Council still departs from advice, though less than before. - For 2026, DG MARE reports that 81% of EU-only fishing opportunities in the Atlantic and Skagerrak–Kattegat were set in line with MSY advice [S28]. - The Commission “could not support” the Council’s Mediterranean compromise [S28]. - In the Baltic the Council again set catch limits higher than the Commission had proposed [S29]: - Bothnian herring: −41%, against a proposed −62%; - central herring: +15%, against a proposed 0%. - The Commission said some elements were “less likely to contribute to the rebuilding” [S29].

A major collapse followed the reform. - The directed eastern Baltic cod fishery in EU waters closed in 2019 [S30]. - For 2026 the Council set bycatch-only TACs for both Baltic cod stocks [S29]. - ICES advises zero catch in 2027–2028, citing a “degraded ecosystem resulting from cumulative anthropogenic pressures and climate change” (including low oxygen) as well as fishing [S30]. - Western Baltic cod is judged to have passed a tipping point “caused by unsustainable exploitation levels that failed to account for changing environmental conditions” [S31, abstract].

Independent critics make the panel’s argument almost verbatim. Froese et al. (2025, Science Policy Forum) are titled “Systemic failure of European fisheries management”. Their summary line: “Overcoming shortsighted interests with politically independent ecosystem-based catch limits may end overfishing in EU waters” [S26, summary line only]. This echoes the panel’s call to treat advice as a “fixed boundary condition” (p. 422). These authors are long-standing critics.

The review is still under way. As of February 2026 the Commission referred to the “ongoing evaluation of the common fisheries policy regulation” and launched a “Vision 2040” consultation [S32]. There is no formal verdict yet.

The economic claim is directionally supported, but the specific numbers have not been re-tested. - The NEF source (cited in the chapter as Crilly 2012; published 10 February 2012) summarises its finding as “over €3 billion is lost every year … This could support 100,000 jobs” [S33]. - This confirms that “EUR 3 188 billion” is a typo for about EUR 3.19 billion. - It shows a jobs figure (100,000) that differs from the chapter’s “more than 80 000”. The chapter may be quoting a subset. I did not read the full NEF PDF. - Later bioeconomic work finds that lower exploitation rebuilds stocks and raises long-run catches and profits [S25, S34, abstracts]. - The Commission links stock recovery to improved fleet profitability (EUR 1.19 billion gross profit, 2021 data) [S27]. - I found no ex-post test of the NEF estimate for the 43 stocks.

Verdict: held up, with a qualification. Sustainability “for all stocks” was not achieved by the 2020 deadline, overrides continue, and a major collapse occurred. But gains in the North-East Atlantic under the reformed CFP were larger than the panel’s pessimism implied.

Implication for weight. Transferable insight 8 (concentrated short-term costs drive repeated override of advice) can carry strong weight. - Hindsight adds a nuance: a legal target plus annual public reporting (Art. 50) reduced but did not eliminate override. - It adds a failure mode: softened reference points can make progress look better than it is [S23, S24]. - Treat the NEF figures as illustrative advocacy numbers, not validated estimates.

Claim 6: “Many decades of tantalising ignorance” about whether any planetary boundary has been crossed. Tipping elements are more likely to define future surprises, and several are already under way: Arctic sea-ice loss, boreal forest dieback, Greenland melt, West Antarctic instability, Atlantic deep-water formation, permafrost loss (pp. 416–417)#

Subsequent developments

The planetary-boundaries team now says most boundaries are crossed. - Steffen et al. (2015) updated the framework [S36]. Richardson et al. (2023) report “six of the nine boundaries are transgressed” [S35]. - The Planetary Health Check reports seven of nine, with ocean acidification crossing in 2025 [S37, 21 September 2026]: - “all seven are now at their highest recorded levels of transgression”; - only ozone and aerosols have improved.

But “transgression” is not the observation of a threshold being crossed. Boundaries are set at the safe end of a zone of uncertainty. - The chapter’s point concerned whether the boundaries “per se” have been crossed, i.e. whether irregular dynamics have been triggered (p. 416). That remains unresolved. - The ocean-acidification boundary’s methodology is itself under revision [S38, conference abstract]. - Critics have long questioned whether global thresholds exist for biosphere processes [S39, S40; titles only, abstracts not retrieved]. - The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 concedes the epistemic point in practical terms: “If we wait for certainty that tipping points have been crossed before we act, it will be too late” [S45].

The prediction that tipping elements will define surprises broadly holds. Tipping elements have become the organising frame of the science-policy literature: - the Global Tipping Points Reports of 2023 and 2025 [S45]; - the Armstrong McKay et al. (2022) reassessment [S41].

The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 states that “warm water coral reefs are crossing their thermal tipping point”, and that parts of the polar ice sheets “may also have crossed tipping points” [S45]. Coral reefs are not on the chapter’s list.

Element by element, the chapter’s “already under way” list fares unevenly:

Verdict: partly held up. - The prediction that tipping elements will frame future surprises is borne out. - The epistemic point about the boundaries per se is largely intact, although the framework’s authors now declare transgression. - The “already under way” list mixes one element later reclassified as not tipping (summer sea ice), one strengthened (ice sheets), one contested (overturning) and two better described as risks.

Implication for weight. Use pp. 416–417 as a statement of the problem (irreducible uncertainty about thresholds and slow system responses), not as evidence about particular elements. The general mechanism is robust: delayed response, sparse direct observation and contested thresholds create long periods in which action must precede proof. Specific element claims should be re-sourced to the current assessments.

Claim 7: Identifying thresholds with a generic tipping-point model is “an exercise in futility”; early warnings must come from cascading thresholds linked to local and regional observation of key processes (p. 417)#

Subsequent developments

Generic early-warning methods expanded after 2013 and drew sharp methodological criticism. - Statistical early-warning signals (rising variance and autocorrelation) were applied to the Atlantic overturning circulation to estimate a tipping time [S46]. - Ben-Yami et al. (2024) argue that “the uncertainties are too high to robustly predict tipping times”. Their reasons include modelling assumptions, “the representativeness of individual Earth system component time series” and data preprocessing [S49]. - van Westen et al. (2024) propose a “physics-based and observable early warning signal”. They report that “classical statistical ones … turn out to be sensitive to the analyzed time interval before tipping” [S47]. That is close to the chapter’s position: warnings tied to observable key processes rather than generic models.

Fisheries evidence points the same way. - A meta-analysis of 23 North Sea, Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea stocks found recruitment regime shifts in more than half the time series. “Non-stationary relationships were extensively prevalent, indicating that each stock is uniquely adapted to its locally varying conditions” [S50, abstract]. - For Barents Sea cod, the working group dropped environmental covariates from its recruitment model in 2024 and now uses survey data only [S17]. - The causes of the recruitment failure remain uncertain [S21].

Generic models still proved useful after the fact. Möllmann et al. (2021) used “statistical changepoint analysis and stochastic cusp modelling” to show that western Baltic cod had passed a tipping point [S31]. They also argue that “present-day fisheries management systems still largely ignore” such dynamics [S31]. Generic models can therefore diagnose a transition retrospectively, even if they cannot reliably anticipate one.

Current guidance combines both approaches. Armstrong McKay et al. call for “improved tipping point risk assessment, early warning capability, and adaptation strategies” [S41]. The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 stresses local action on non-climate stressors, for example reducing overfishing and nutrient loading on reefs [S45].

Verdict: partly held up. - “Futility” overstates the case: generic methods are widely used and can diagnose transitions after the fact. - The core claim is supported by the best recent work, however. Prediction from generic statistics is unreliable. Process-specific, locally observed signals are more robust. Stock- and site-specific non-stationarity is the rule.

Implication for weight. A qualified form of this lesson can carry moderate-to-strong weight: generic early-warning indicators are useful for diagnosis but not for timing, and warnings should be anchored in observation of the specific processes that drive the system. Transferable insight 3 in the digest (evidence rules can exclude the earliest warnings) links here. Local process observation is often the kind of evidence that assessment rules exclude.

Claim 8: After the collapse the social structure of the Newfoundland fishery collapsed while scientists and managers made only “modest changes”, suggesting authority built on “a certain control of science” is more deeply entrenched than assumed (p. 419)#

Subsequent developments

The social collapse is confirmed and quantified. - Eddy (2026): “The number of fishing ports, vessels, and fishers all declined by more than 70%” between 1998 and 2023. Fisheries shifted to shellfish, and catches dropped by 25% while total value stayed “relatively stable” [S16, abstract]. - The moratorium “put 30 000 Newfoundlanders out of work” [S16].

Scientific and management institutions changed more than “modestly”, though slowly. - Harvester-collected data. DFO has run sentinel surveys since 1995, in which harvesters collect catch-rate and biological data. CSAS published “Sentinel Surveys 1995–2018 – Catch Rates and Biological Information on Atlantic Cod … in NAFO Divisions 2J3KL” in April 2024 [S9, title only]. - The assessment model. The 2023 framework added inshore juvenile surveys, capelin effects and time-varying natural mortality [S1, S4]. - The Fisheries Act (2019 amendments). New s. 2.5 lets the Minister consider: - “the application of a precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach”; - “Indigenous knowledge”; - “community knowledge”; - “the preservation or promotion of the independence of licence holders in commercial inshore fisheries” [S10]. - Allocation. The reopened fishery allocates most of the TAC to inshore harvesters: 80% in 2025 and 70% in 2026 [S6, S7].

But the pattern of override and repetition persists. - 2025 quota. DFO science advised that “the risk of stock decline from 2025 to 2028 is moderate to moderately high” (56–71%), that “there is no level of removals that gives a high (≥75%) probability of stock growth”, and that “short-term prospects for stock growth are limited even under zero removals” [S2]. - The Minister more than doubled the TAC to 38,000 t [S6]. Total authorised removals of 42,867 t [S1] sat at, indeed slightly above, the top of the range science had examined (0–42,634 t) [S2]. - The release framed the decision as having “a high probability (73%) of maintaining the stock above the critical zone” [S6], i.e. a 27% risk of falling back into it. - In the event the stock grew in 2025, helped by favourable ocean and prey conditions [S1]. - Rose (2026). “Management objectives are opaque”, and fisheries were reopened “despite advice by government and independent science to keep removals low” [S11]. - Snow crab. Mullowney and Baker (2020) document that snow crab replaced cod as the main fishery. “Since 2012, there have been repeated warnings given about an imminent large decline”. Exploitation rates rose “at or near historical highs”, and they highlight “commonalities” with the cod collapse [S15, abstract]. - Snow crab review. In March 2026 DFO launched a review of the snow crab precautionary framework whose stated aim is “greater stability in TAC levels from year-to-year” for harvesters, plant workers and markets [S8].

Verdict: partly held up. - The social part of the claim is strengthened. - The “modest changes” part is too strong for the period since 2013. DFO’s assessment practice and the legal framework changed substantially. - The later record shows that authority over quota decisions lies with ministers, who have repeatedly gone beyond cautious science advice. Science advice was not the entrenched authority. This fits the chapter’s broader argument about vested interests (p. 423) better than its specific claim about the entrenched authority of science (p. 419).

Implication for weight. Transferable insight 12 in the digest (knowledge institutions survive their failures; costs fall on the least powerful) should stay “suggestive”. - The cost half is well evidenced [S16]. - The half about institutional entrenchment is ambiguous: the science institution changed, and the decision-making pattern persisted.

Claim 9: IPBES formally recognises indigenous and local knowledge but is “still struggling to find operational ways” to include it (p. 416)#

Subsequent developments

IPBES has built operational machinery. - In 2017 the IPBES Plenary approved the “Approach to recognizing and working with indigenous and local knowledge” (Annex II to decision IPBES-5/1). It applies “across the four functions of IPBES” and includes “the participatory mechanism for working with indigenous, local and diverse knowledge systems” [S52]. - IPBES lists as achievements [S51]: - that approach; - “methodological guidance for recognizing and working with ILK in IPBES”; - a participatory mechanism. - Decision IPBES-7/1 (2019) extended the ILK task force to 2030 [S51]. - ILK dialogue workshops have been held for recent assessments: the Nexus and Transformative Change assessments (2024) and business and biodiversity. Workshops on scenarios and on monitoring followed in 2025 [S51]. - The 2019 Global Assessment is cited as showing that at least a quarter of global land is traditionally owned, managed, used or occupied by Indigenous Peoples [S51].

Scholarly critique continues. - Löfmarck and Lidskog (2017) found that IPBES “struggles to reconcile an open, collaborative atmosphere with the demands for structure set by the scientific format”. They found it also “often treats scientific knowledge and indigenous or local knowledge as easily distinguishable entities” and “has yet to solve the epistemological challenges” [S53, abstract]. - Wiegleb and Bruns (2022), studying the Global Assessment process, found that boundary work “continuously established science as authoritative voice”, with “uneven geographies of knowledge” [S54, abstract]. - Brondízio et al. (2021) conclude that the contributions of Indigenous peoples and local communities “have yet to be fully recognized” in policy [S56, abstract]. - See also Tengö et al. (2017) on “weaving” knowledge systems [S55].

Verdict: partly held up. Accurate in 2013. Since then IPBES has developed operational procedures, so “struggling to find operational ways” no longer describes it. Whether ILK is integrated on equal terms remains contested.

Implication for weight. The general lesson on widening knowledge sources (p. 423; digest insight 3) is supported. Formal inclusion procedures can be built within a few years. Hindsight adds that formal inclusion does not by itself change whose knowledge counts as authoritative [S53, S54].

Claim 10: Six lessons (close observation; diversity-oriented approach; wider knowledge sources; shorter delays; understanding the full adaptive cycle; capacity for transformation, with participation and transparency about vested interests) and agreeing in advance “which diagnostic criteria and metrics will be used to elicit action” on early warnings (p. 423)#

Subsequent developments

Pre-agreed triggers are now standard, but hindsight exposes three weaknesses.

1. The metrics can be re-specified. - Northern cod’s LRP was revised down about 40% in 2023 [S3]; by Rose’s account the cumulative reduction is from 1.3 to 0.25 million t [S11]. - In the EU, 46 of 84 North-East Atlantic stocks use Bpa as their MSY trigger [S23], which yields over-optimistic status [S24]. - DFO’s snow crab review aims explicitly at TAC stability [S8]. - For Barents Sea cod, Johannesen et al. suggest “setting reference points based on the recent period with low productivity” [S21], and the working group has explored an S-shaped rule [S17]. - Re-specification is sometimes scientifically justified. It is also a channel for pressure.
2. Stability clauses can delay the response. The Barents Sea cod rule’s ±20% limit on TAC change kept fishing “well above the target … for several years” [S17].
3. Escape clauses and overrides persist. - Canada’s Fisheries Act requires measures to keep major stocks above the LRP and rebuilding plans below it (ss. 6.1–6.2, added in 2019). The Minister may nonetheless depart from these “for cultural reasons or because of adverse socio-economic impacts” (s. 6.1(2)) or amend plans to mitigate such impacts (s. 6.2(2)) [S10]. - TACs above rule-based advice occurred in the Barents Sea in 2025 [S17].

Close observation. - Long survey series underpin every recovery and decline documented above [S1, S17, S23]. - They also proved fragile. Russia’s exit from ICES broke the internationally reviewed assessment of the world’s largest cod stock [S19]. - The eastern Baltic cod assessment has fallen back on a survey index, because the analytical model was not accepted and Russian catch data lack biological sampling [S30].

Diversity-oriented approach and the full adaptive cycle. Later work calls for managing age and spatial diversity explicitly: - Johannesen et al. (2026) recommend “including demographic characteristics like age diversity as explicit management targets” [S21]; - Rose and Rowe (2022) call for a “portfolio” of spawning components [S12].

Canadian and EU assessments now include ecosystem and climate sections [S1, S30].

Shorter delays. The record is mixed: - Canada took 32 years to reopen and then moved quickly to raise quotas [S5–S7]. - The EU closed eastern Baltic cod only in 2019, after a long decline [S30].

Verdict: partly held up. The direction of all six lessons is supported by later scholarship and increasingly by law and practice. The specific recommendation on pre-agreed diagnostic criteria has been widely adopted. Hindsight shows it is necessary but not sufficient: criteria can be revised downwards, capped by stability rules or set aside under statutory escape clauses.

Implication for weight. Digest insight 13 (pre-agreed triggers reduce delay) should move from “asserted” to “supported, with conditions”. Triggers help when three things hold: 1. the criteria themselves are protected from convenient revision; 2. caps on the rate of change do not override them when the system is declining; 3. departures are published and justified.

The chapter’s own call for “transparency regarding vested interests” (p. 423) is the missing ingredient in most of the failures documented here.

Sources#

Canada: DFO science advice and decisions - [S1] DFO. NAFO Divisions 2J3KL Northern Cod (Gadus morhua) Stock Assessment to 2026. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2026/030. Published 2 July 2026. https://csas-scas.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications-publications/f7f156a8-b0ef-4840-b2e0-4573fb325faa?lang=en - [S2] DFO. NAFO Divisions 2J3KL Northern Cod (Gadus morhua) Stock Assessment to 2025. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2025/043. Published 11 September 2025. https://csas-scas.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications-publications/52890c91-55cd-41fb-a2fa-58177918aa5a?lang=en - [S3] DFO. NAFO Divisions 2J3KL Northern Cod (Gadus morhua) Stock Assessment to 2024. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2024/049. Published 12 September 2024. https://csas-scas.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications-publications/0f392a62-f7bc-4d71-a3c9-81a886959bc6?lang=en - [S4] DFO. Northern (2J3KL) Atlantic Cod Assessment Framework. Sci. Advis. Rep. 2024/046 (from the 16–20 October 2023 peer review). Published 29 August 2024. https://csas-scas.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications-publications/9de30806-cb39-4315-8a61-1dc6079a4029?lang=en - [S5] Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The Government of Canada announces the historic return of the commercial Northern cod fishery in Newfoundland and Labrador. News release, 26 June 2024. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2024/06/the-government-of-canada-announces-the-historic-return-of-the-commercial-northern-cod-fishery-in-newfoundland-and-labrador.html - [S6] Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Contributing to a stronger economy for Newfoundland and Labrador: Canada announces a sustainable increase in Northern cod TAC. News release, 18 June 2025. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2025/06/contributing-to-a-stronger-economy-for-newfoundland-and-labrador-canada-announces-a-sustainable-increase-in-northern-cod-tac.html - Backgrounder: Northern cod commercial fishery, 18 June 2025. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2025/06/northern-cod-commercial-fishery.html - [S7] Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Northern cod quota to increase 55 per cent: Minister Thompson announces 2026 management decisions for Northern cod, Northern Gulf cod, and Northeast and south coast capelin for Newfoundland and Labrador. News release, 12 June 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2026/06/northern-cod-quota-to-increase-55-per-cent-minister-thompson-announces-2026-management-decisions-for-northern-cod-northern-gulf-cod-and-northeast-a.html - Backgrounder: Northern Cod: Socio-Economic Performance, 12 June 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2026/06/northern-cod-socio-economic-performance.html - [S8] Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Government of Canada announces 2026 Snow crab management decision and launch of Precautionary Approach Review for Newfoundland and Labrador. News release, 27 March 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2026/03/government-of-canada-announces-2026-snow-crab-management-decision-and-launch-of-precautionary-approach-review-for-newfoundland-and-labrador.html - [S9] CSAS publications database, listing for Sentinel Surveys 1995–2018 – Catch Rates and Biological Information on Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) in NAFO Divisions 2J3KL (22 April 2024). Title and date only. https://csas-scas.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/publications-publications/?lang=en - [S10] Fisheries Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-14, ss. 2.5, 6.1, 6.2 (as added by S.C. 2019, c. 14). Justice Laws Website, consulted September 2026. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/f-14/FullText.html

Northern cod: peer-reviewed literature - [S11] Rose, G. A. Northern cod comeback: 10 years after. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2026;83:1–14 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2025-0141 - Also cited by title only: Rowe, S., Rose, G. A. Canadian cod comeback derailed. Nature 2018;556:436 (20 April 2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04898-4 - [S12] Rose, G. A., Rowe, S. Congruence of stock production and assessment areas? An historical perspective on Canada’s iconic Northern cod. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2022;79:1173–1187 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0230 - [S13] Schijns, R., Froese, R., Hutchings, J. A., Pauly, D. Five centuries of cod catches in Eastern Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2021;78:2675–2683 (28 August 2021; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab153 - The exchange cited in the Claim 1 text, titles only: - Holm, P., Hayes, P. W., Nicholls, J. Comment on “Five centuries of cod catches in eastern Canada”. ICES J Mar Sci 2022;79:1705–1707. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac089 - Schijns, R., Froese, R., Hutchings, J. A., Pauly, D. Reply to Holm et al. 2022. ICES J Mar Sci 2022;79:1708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac090 - [S14] Puncher, G. N., Rowe, S., Rose, G. A., Leblanc, N. M., et al. Chromosomal inversions in the Atlantic cod genome: implications for management of Canada’s Northern cod stock. Fisheries Research 2019;216:29–40 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.03.020 - [S15] Mullowney, D. R. J., Baker, K. D. Gone to shell: removal of a million tonnes of snow crab since cod moratorium in the Newfoundland and Labrador fishery. Fisheries Research 2020;230:105680 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105680 - [S16] Eddy, T. D. The changing landscape of Newfoundland fisheries after the cod collapse. Ambio 2026 (online 19 June 2026; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02438-3

Barents Sea (Northeast Arctic) cod and capelin - [S17] Joint Russian-Norwegian Arctic Fisheries Working Group (JRN-AFWG). Advice on fishing opportunities for Northeast Arctic cod in 2026 in ICES subareas 1 and 2. IMR-PINRO report 2025-4. Published 1 July 2025. Includes tables of advice, TAC and catch history (1987–2026) and stock summary (1946–2025). https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/imr-pinro-2025-4 - [S18] Bogstad, B., et al. (JRN-AFWG). Advice on fishing opportunities for Barents Sea capelin in 2026. IMR-PINRO report 2025-8. Published 10 December 2025. https://www.hi.no/en/hi/nettrapporter/imr-pinro-en-2025-8 - [S19] ICES. Arctic Fisheries Working Group (AFWG) 2026 report. ICES Scientific Reports 8:28. Published 2 July 2026. Executive summary and NEA cod section read. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.32134696 - [S20] ICES. Working Group on the Integrated Assessments of the Barents Sea (WGIBAR), interim report 2025. ICES Scientific Reports 7:103. Published 16 January 2026. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.30437117 - [S21] Johannesen, E., Ottersen, G., Berg, F., Bogstad, B., et al. The abrupt and persistent decline in recruitment success in Northeast Arctic cod: a review of probable causes. Fish and Fisheries 2026;27:643–659 (5 March 2026; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70074 - [S22] Wikipedia. Minister of Fisheries and Ocean Policy (Norway), list of office-holders citing regjeringen.no historical cabinet pages. Consulted September 2026. Secondary source, used because regjeringen.no was blocked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_of_Fisheries_and_Ocean_Policy

EU Common Fisheries Policy - [S23] STECF. Monitoring the Performance of the Common Fisheries Policy (STECF-Adhoc-26-01). Advice provided to the Commission 20 March 2026 (final report pending publication). https://stecf.ec.europa.eu/document/3f68b367-a501-43a4-b638-9593da63ac5b - Report listing: https://stecf.ec.europa.eu/reports/cfp-monitoring_en - [S24] Winker, H., Cardinale, M., Sharma, R., Kell, L. T., et al. Assessing the progress of stock rebuilding in the Northeast Atlantic against levels that can produce maximum sustainable yield. Fish and Fisheries 2026;27(3):519–536 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70066 - [S25] Froese, R., Winker, H., Coro, G., Demirel, N., et al. Status and rebuilding of European fisheries. Marine Policy 2018;93:159–170 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.018 - [S26] Froese, R., Steiner, N., Papaioannou, E., MacNeil, L., et al. Systemic failure of European fisheries management. Science 2025;388(6749):826–828 (22 May 2025). Title and published summary line only; full text paywalled. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adv4341 - [S27] DG MARE. The state of EU fisheries: latest facts and figures on the common fisheries policy. 12 December 2025. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/state-eu-fisheries-latest-facts-and-figures-common-fisheries-policy-2025-12-12_en - [S28] DG MARE. Fisheries ministers agree on fishing opportunities for 2026, in the Atlantic and North Sea, and in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. 13 December 2025. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/fisheries-ministers-agree-fishing-opportunities-2026-atlantic-and-north-sea-and-mediterranean-and-2025-12-13_en - [S29] DG MARE. Agreement reached on 2026 fishing opportunities for the Baltic Sea. 28 October 2025. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/agreement-reached-2026-fishing-opportunities-baltic-sea-2025-10-28_en - [S30] ICES. Cod (Gadus morhua) in subdivisions 24–32, eastern Baltic stock (eastern Baltic Sea). ICES Advice 2026, cod.27.24-32. Published 29 May 2026. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.30932015 - [S31] Möllmann, C., Cormon, X., Funk, S., Otto, S. A., et al. Tipping point realized in cod fishery. Scientific Reports 2021;11:14259 (12 July 2021; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93843-z - [S32] DG MARE. Commission seeks feedback on the future of the fisheries and aquaculture sector (Vision 2040; refers to the “ongoing evaluation of the common fisheries policy regulation”). 24 February 2026. https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-seeks-feedback-future-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector-2026-02-24_en - [S33] New Economics Foundation. Jobs lost at sea: overfishing and the jobs that never were. 10 February 2012. The chapter cites it as Crilly (2012); the publication page credits Aniol Esteban. Publication page via Internet Archive (snapshot 14 September 2015); summary only, full PDF not read. http://web.archive.org/web/20150914173730/http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/jobs-lost-at-sea - [S34] Touloumis, K., Tsikliras, A. C., Dimarchopoulou, D. Revisiting rebuilding options of European fisheries. Frontiers in Marine Science 2026;13 (30 January 2026; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2026.1685780

Planetary boundaries and tipping elements - [S35] Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Lucht, W., Bendtsen, J., et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances 2023;9(37):eadh2458 (15 September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 - [S36] Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015;347(6223):1259855 (13 February 2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 - [S37] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Planetary Health Check 2026 finds mounting pressures across Earth’s life support systems. Press release, 21 September 2026. https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/planetary-health-check-2026-finds-mounting-pressures-across-earth2019s-life-support-systems - Full report: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_35009_3/component/file_35022/content - [S38] Mathesius, S., Caesar, L. Ocean acidification in the Planetary Boundaries Framework. EGU General Assembly 2026, abstract EGU26-12218 (14 March 2026). https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12218 - [S39] Montoya, J. M., Donohue, I., Pimm, S. L. Planetary boundaries for biodiversity: implausible science, pernicious policies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2018;33(2):71–73. Title only; abstract not retrieved. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.10.004 - [S40] Brook, B. W., Ellis, E. C., Perring, M. P., Mackay, A. W., et al. Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2013;28(7):396–401. Title only; abstract not retrieved. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.016 - [S41] Armstrong McKay, D. I., Staal, A., Abrams, J. F., Winkelmann, R., et al. Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 2022;377(6611):eabn7950 (9 September 2022; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950 - [S42] Armstrong McKay, D. I. Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points – paper explainer. climatetippingpoints.info, 9 September 2022. Lead author’s explainer; secondary to S41. https://climatetippingpoints.info/2022/09/09/climate-tipping-points-reassessment-explainer/ - [S43] IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers, statements C.3.2 and C.3.4. 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf - [S44] IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Technical Summary, p. 76 (Arctic sea ice). 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_TS.pdf - [S45] Global Tipping Points Report 2025, key messages (160 authors from 23 countries and 87 institutions; released ahead of COP30, 2025). Consulted September 2026. https://global-tipping-points.org/ - [S46] Ditlevsen, P., Ditlevsen, S. Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Nature Communications 2023;14:4254 (25 July 2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39810-w - [S47] van Westen, R. M., Kliphuis, M., Dijkstra, H. A. Physics-based early warning signal shows that AMOC is on tipping course. Science Advances 2024;10(6):eadk1189 (9 February 2024). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk1189 - [S48] Terhaar, J., Vogt, L., Foukal, N. P. Atlantic overturning inferred from air-sea heat fluxes indicates no decline since the 1960s. Nature Communications 2025;16:222 (15 January 2025; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55297-5 - [S49] Ben-Yami, M., Morr, A., Bathiany, S., Boers, N. Uncertainties too large to predict tipping times of major Earth system components from historical data. Science Advances 2024;10(31):eadl4841 (2 August 2024). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adl4841 - [S50] Ma, S., Huse, G., Ono, K., Nash, R. D. M., et al. Recruitment regime shifts and nonstationarity are widespread phenomena in harvestable stocks experiencing pronounced climate fluctuations. Fish and Fisheries 2024;25(2):320–348 (online 19 December 2023; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12810

IPBES and indigenous and local knowledge - [S51] IPBES. Indigenous and local knowledge in IPBES and Indigenous and local knowledge work (mandate, task force, dialogues). Consulted September 2026. https://www.ipbes.net/indigenous-local-knowledge and https://www.ipbes.net/indigenous-local-knowledge/our-work - [S52] IPBES. Report of the Plenary … on the work of its fifth session (IPBES/5/15), Annex II to decision IPBES-5/1: Approach to recognizing and working with indigenous and local knowledge in IPBES. 11 April 2017. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/inline/files/ipbes_ilkapproach_ipbes-5-15.pdf - [S53] Löfmarck, E., Lidskog, R. Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide. Environmental Science & Policy 2017;69:22–28 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008 - [S54] Wiegleb, V., Bruns, A. Working the boundary: science–policy interactions and uneven knowledge politics in IPBES. Sustainability Science 2023;18(3):1069–1084 (online 5 November 2022; abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01238-4 - [S55] Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., et al. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2017;26–27:17–25 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005 - [S56] Brondízio, E. S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., et al. Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: Indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2021;46:481–509 (abstract only). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127